Stephen Judd wrote: > In part I was wondering if this is a trial and error kind of thing, or > if a more precise calculation may be applied, e.g. for every x cycles, > add y cycles. My naive MHz calculation says that around 50 drive cycles > is about 51 NTSC cycles (or 49 PAL cycles) -- in other words, that If you are doign a fastloader, you better switch off the screen, as teh VIC stops the CPU for a number of cycles every 8 rasterlines to fetch new character data. Andre -- Email address may be invalid. Use "fachat AT physik DOT tu-chemnitz DOT de" ------Fight SPAM - join CAUCE http://www.cauce.org------Thanks, spammers... Andre Fachat, Institute of physics, Technische Universitšt Chemnitz, FRG http://www.tu-chemnitz.de/~fachat - This message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list. To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe | mail firstname.lastname@example.org.
Archive generated by hypermail 2.1.1.